DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19897 Patch to implement the namespaced antlib + other changes ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-07-15 15:35 ------- No problem. I want antlib files to be able to define new definers. For example: Assume that someone may want to have a class RunDef - like TaskDef that extends Typedef.java and sets the adaptto and adapter classes. <typedef name="rundef" classname="org.acme.anttasks.RunDef"/> and then use this definition in the same antlib file: <rundef name="x" classname="org.acme.anttasks.X"/> I actually ran into this problem when mapping ant's conditions/filters /mappers/selectors to an antlib using <extendtype/> and a "role" attribute to <typedef/> <antlib> <extendtype name="conditiondef"> <typedef role="o.a.t.a.taskdefs.condition.Condition"/> </extendtype> <extendtype name="selectordef"> <typedef role="o.a.t.a.types.selectors.FileSelector"/> </extendtype> <conditiondef name="or" classname="o.a.t.a.taskdefs.condition.Or"/> <selectordef name="or" classname="o.a.t.a.types.selectors.OrSelector"/> </antlib> I tried playing with add(Definer d) and addConfigured(Definer d), but both do not work for different reasons. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
