[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Andrew Marlow wrote: >> Hello, >> The msg below was originally intended for Steve L, another >> Ant developer, but I have had trouble contacting him so >> I am now sending this to a wider audience. > >sorry I have been in crisis, but am glad you are on the main mail list. >Apologies. No prob. > >> Attached is the result of running latex2html on the source. >> Please let me have some feedback on this ASAP. >> This is quite alot of work and I am only roughly half-way through. >> I need to know if people will be happy with this. > >And here the fact that the mail list strips out html files and big >attachments are making it harder to post. Adding the files as >attachments to a bugzilla report works nicely.
Please see http:/www.marlowa.plus.com/a2.tar.bz2 This is a bzip'd tarball of HTML generated from the LaTeX source. > > >As far as the actual files, the effect of the underlying latex port is >to give us a good printed document, and a self-content-creating manual >in functional HTML. Yes, that was the aim. Plus, we can still get DocBook. > >I am unsure what is the best way to go from the existing HTML to .dbk; >Maybe via latex is the right way; I'd just assumed cut-paste-and-edit >would be it. I certainly agree with Andrew in that routing >printable content via pdflatex gives us the best printing material. > >Who know of any good .dbk editors for windows & unix? I do. XAE, a set of macros for Emacs. This is what I used on my last DocBook project. >There is some >stuff about add-on support in OpenOffice.org 1.1, but I havent played >with it. > >-Steve > Regards, Andrew ---- There is an emerald here the size of a plover's egg! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
