On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't have any fixed timeframe in mind, or anything so concrete at > this stage but I think we need to start looking at it.
Generally fine with me. > After all, I can only stand seeing the javah bug reported so many > times. Funny how often there is one bug that gets a lot of airplay > that it indicates a release may be a good idea. Hmm, if this is a pressing bug, we may as well think about 1.5.4 instead. I'd even be willing to wade through all those "small" bugfixes and merge them over to the 1.5 branch ... Not that I was keen on doing another 1.5 release, but if the bug is causing real trouble we may be better of with a bugfix release soon rather than 1.6 in a couple of months. > 1. Code cleanup +1 > 2. Import task > > I think this needs more testing and work. as well as documentation - without reading the code, I don't have any idea how it is supposed to work. Without documentation I'm not even sure it does things that I'd want it (Ant) to do. > 3. Antlibs > > I'm not sure where this is up to. AddType has gone in but other bits > are still to be done. I think once we have a workable antlib, we > need to look at the packaging of the Ant optional tasks. I'd like to > have polymorphism as part of all this. Dito. > 5. lcp.bat replacement Necessary, but I won't be of much help here (as a long CLASSPATH doesn't cause problems on the OSes I use). Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
