On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This continues with the two-tier issue, the core conditions of ANT > you can just named, but the third party ones need to use some funny > syntax. core conditions would use the same funny syntax, if it wasn't for backwards compatibility, that is. But then again this "funny syntax" for potentially highly dynamic things like the condition or linereader framework makes me back away from it. I think it also is what made me argue against it about nine months back 8-) OK, so <condition> <outofdate> it is, with an addXYZ(Condition) method marking it up - I'm not really fond of any of the proposed naming conventions so far. We still need a solution for the ambiguos cases, though. Stefan
