> From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Erik Hatcher wrote: > > > What I'm trying to say is that a lot of things we might want > later will > be simpler, and we won't have to bloat the antlib SAX > processor to implement > such features. > > I'm sure there are some valid uses cases and extensions that > we may add - > even if those 2 use cases are completely wrong. It is very > unlikely antlib > will never change. > >
Sure will change. The only comment I have about reusing ProjectHelper is that that means all those UnknownElement blah blah blah and cruft that is needed for projects but I do not see why would be needed here. If we are talking about a parser that uses introspection to fill-up the datastructure representing the antlib descriptor, then I have no problem on that. For new changes we just need some new objects defined and some symbol table to map the elements. Jose Alberto
