On Friday 25 April 2003 14:30, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > because it feels more natural? > > > <classpath ant:type="PathThatIgnoresBuildSysclassPathToTrickGump"> > > or > > <PathThatIgnoresBuildSysclassPathToTrickGump ant:element="classpath"> > I see. This is an interesting idea, whether is more natural is debatable ;-).
A thing to note is that "ant:" assumes that an xml namespace is set-up, <... xmlns:ant="..."> Another similar idea could be: <classpath implementationClass="acme.ant.TrickGump" ... > are alternatives (without any claim for completeness) with quite > different consequences when it comes to the implementation side of > things. One of the consequences is that Javac's public method createClasspath() may need to be modified. Peter
