DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249 javadoc @doclet.ins equivalent [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Major |Enhancement ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-04-25 06:50 ------- If you really already have all your packages listed in doclet.ins you are not going to gain anything by using <javadoc> instead of <exec> - well, <javadoc> doesn't need the javadoc executable in the PATH, but that's pretty much all. You must give <javadoc> at leas one source file or package name to chew upon as it really has been invented for a more dynamic system than yours. This also is a workaround for you, simply give it a single source file you will want to have docced anyway. You can pass your @doclet.ins via the additionalparam attribute.
