On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Jene Jasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Enabling the taskdefs to work with both versions seems pretty > straight forward.
Great. The task already deals with JavaCC < 2.0 and >= 2.0 differently, so throwing in additional support for 3.0 would be nice. The difference so far is just the location of JavaCC.zip, 3.0 then adds the package name change. > Any suggestions for the attribute name: javaccversion "2.1" or "3.0" > or package "com" or "org" ? As it supports < 2.0 as well, maybe we just need the major version number (which then would be 1, 2 or 3)? Stefan