The changelog in common.ai provider is technically right. (from commit history 
perspective)

```
Add branch_descriptions to LLMBranchOperator so the model reads what each 
branch means (#73639)
```

but it can be misleading as it's changed into branches later on (within 
0.10.0rc1).
Could we also change it before release?

On 2026/09/28 10:40:34 Shahar Epstein wrote:
> Thank you very much!
> edge3 will be excluded from the current release (-1 binding).
> 
> 
> Shahar
> 
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 1:27 PM PoAn Yang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Shahar,
> >
> > Thanks for preparing this release!
> >
> > I found a regression in apache-airflow-providers-edge3 5.0.0rc1 that comes
> > from my own PR #72048 [1]. When the scheduler restarts while Edge task
> > instances from the previous scheduler are still queued or running, the new
> > scheduler crashes on startup with DetachedInstanceError. It keeps crashing
> > the same way on every restart for as long as those task instances stay
> > queued or running. I reproduced it with the RC from PyPI on Airflow 3.3.2.
> > The edge3 4.3.2 does not have the problem. I also tried the upgrade path:
> > after a scheduler running edge3 4.3.2 queues some Edge tasks and stops, the
> > first scheduler start after upgrading to 5.0.0rc1 crashes the same way.
> >
> > Could we exclude edge3? The fix is in [2]. Once that PR is merged, edge3
> > could go out in an rc2.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding) for amazon, apache.beam and google
> > -1 (non-binding) for edge3 because of this regression
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/72048
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73832
> >
> > Thanks,
> > PoAn
> >
> >
> > > On Sep 27, 2026, at 4:00 PM, Sameer Mesiah <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > I can verify that my changes for the Amazon and Snowflake providers for
> > > this release wave are working as expected.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2026 at 09:50, Wei Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 (binding), checked:
> > >>
> > >> - SVN
> > >> - in Docker installation
> > >> - Reproducible package builds
> > >> - Licence
> > >> - Signature
> > >> - Checksums
> > >>
> > >> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Wei Lee
> > >>
> > >> On 2026/09/25 08:22:48 Pankaj Koti via dev wrote:
> > >>> +1 non-binding
> > >>>
> > >>> Tested that my PRs are included in the RC and working as expected,
> > thanks
> > >>> for cutting the release!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 3:32 AM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1 (binding)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Checked:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * SVN: all expected files present (check-release-files), and all 78 RC
> > >>>>  providers install at their RC versions (Dockerfile.pmc)
> > >>>> * Signatures: all 157 good (Shahar's key from KEYS)
> > >>>> * Checksums: all 157 SHA512 good
> > >>>> * Licences: Apache RAT 0.18 - 0 unapproved, 0 unknown
> > >>>> * Reproducible builds: the source tarball and all 156 packages are
> > >>>>  byte-identical when rebuilt from the providers/2026-09-22 tag with
> > >>>>  flit 4.0.2
> > >>>>
> > >>>> One note on reproducibility, not a blocker: the wheels were built with
> > >>>> flit 4.0.2, but dev/breeze/uv.lock at the tag locks flit 4.1.0. Since
> > >>>> flit builds without isolation, rebuilding with the locked Breeze (as
> > >>>> the docs say) gives 75 wheels that differ only in the "Generator:"
> > >>>> line of their WHEEL file (and its hash in RECORD) - the packaged files
> > >>>> are identical. I opened a PR explaining how to rebuild with the
> > >>>> release manager's flit version:
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73699
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I also tested all my changes in this wave with all 78 RC providers
> > >>>> installed from the PyPI wheels in Breeze (Airflow 3.3.2):
> > >>>>
> > >>>> * #72162 (amazon, google, microsoft.azure) - remote log uploads
> > outside
> > >>>>  base_log_folder are skipped, uploads inside still work
> > >>>> * #72166 (google) - Drive q= values are escaped
> > >>>> * #73413 (common.sql) - DataFusion error message shows the storage
> > type
> > >>>> * #72627 (edge3) - docs only, present in the release
> > >>>> * #72174 (snowflake) and #72176 (teradata) - in the wave, though not
> > >>>>  listed in the testing issue - both work as expected
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Improvement to the verification process:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I tested all my changes with an agent using Apache Magpie's
> > >>>> release-management
> > >>>> "verify-rc" skill and a new Airflow override that adds an optional
> > >> "test
> > >>>> your own changes" step. The agent found my entries in the testing
> > issue
> > >>>> (and the two changes missing from it), verified each change is in the
> > >>>> RC tags, changelogs and wheels, downloaded the whole wave and wrote a
> > >>>> Dag exercising every change - I only had to start Breeze and trigger
> > >> it.
> > >>>> It also ran the regular checks above and tracked down the flit
> > >>>> difference.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That was a very good experience - I highly recommend trying it:
> > >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/73697
> > >>>>
> > >>>> J.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to