Thanks Niko, I was trying to find that thread too, since I had a similar
recollection.
David,
A couple of comments and questions:
1. I think resolving whether this should be integrated into one of the
existing 4 Microsoft providers is important.
Similar to other provider conversations (for example Oracle), I don't
think it should automatically default to the Azure provider.
I am not immediately opposed, but it logically seems different.
2. From a quick glance, at least 2 of the 4 Microsoft providers are
candidates for deprecation.
Given that, why do you believe there is sufficient interest in adding
and maintaining the Microsoft Fabric provider?
Best regards,
Vikram
On Fri, Sep 11, 2026 at 2:14 PM Niko Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 from me, this is worth having!
>
> I remember the discussion a couple years ago (went and found it on the dev
> lsit [1]), someone from the Fabric team proposed the same thing. Nobody
> entirely objected to the integration itself, but the thread kind of stalled
> after explaining the minimum requirements. It looks like, based on what you
> linked, they went and built it outside of Airflow.
>
> Do you plan to add the integration to the Azure provider, or a new
> microsoft.fabric one? Anyone from Microsoft helping this time around and
> available to steward the Azure provider these days?
>
> Cheers,
> Niko
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/2yrwzgzbo44fqo2rgcyqxw1sjd2sob30
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 1:49 AM Aaron Chen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1, I think it would be great to have it in the Azure provider.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 4:41 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Go ahead!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2026 at 9:03 AM Blain David <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering if there would be interest of having Fabric integration
> > in
> > > > Airflow via the Azure provider?
> > > >
> > > > There is already an existing provider from Microsoft here:
> > > > https://github.com/microsoft/airflow-providers-microsoft-fabric
> > > >
> > > > But it's not maintained, and only compatible with Airflow 2 and thus
> > > > doesn't work in Airflow 3.
> > > >
> > > > If yes, then I would be planning to add it into the Airflow Microsoft
> > > > Azure Provider.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > General (Internal Property)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
