No. I think we need to solve it here (I commented on it in the thread. Elad, I'm not sure what problem you are trying to solve.
Would love to solve it here - because usually (-1) is a sign that something is catastrophically wrong with the provider. I'm a bit surprised to see (-1) because things were not exactly explained in the PR (but later explained in the changelog) there are about a 100 of such bumps in the last year at minimum in various providers, so I am just surprised to see ti. I discussed some of that with Radu personally and Thomas directly and some of that is in the PR itself. And this happens **all**, **the**, **time** that we do such changes. This is one of the biggest benefits of a monorepo: we can solve such issues in a single PR that fixes holistically the problem of installing providers together. I really look forward to solving it in the way you will be happy - but I can't see a reason why suddenly you vote -1 on something that we do all the time so far. We might want to change the approach if you want to - but I don't think it's a reason to -1 a provider - that looks like extreme overhoot. J.
