Hey everyone, I had created the i18n policy just before LLM agents started to pop up, so currently it feels quite outdated and way overcomplicated. For example, there is no real need at this point for "freeze time", or even distinguishing "engaged translators" from "translation owners". I used ChatGPT to simplify the policy - and it seems to achieve equivalent guidelines in half of the original size: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/65630
Since it's a change of a policy which we agreed upon, it should be technically discussed and approved in the dev list. However, as I do believe that the essence and the necessity of the simplification are clear (and the technical details aren't too interesting) - I'd rather let it pass as a lazy consensus, and discuss the details in the PR itself. Therefore, I call for a lazy consensus which will last for 72 hours. If no objections are made, the vote will be considered as pass, and the PR will be merged once finalized. Thank you, Shahar
