Looks like things still work smoothly > On Mar 23, 2026, at 11:27 PM, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > BW, I hope that after the recent ownership change our "unspoken" agreement > on Android ruff rules—where Astral consulted us about the rules—will be > kept. > > But I think we should be ready to adapt. > > J. > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 12:25 PM Dev-iL <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Lazy consensus passed. >> >> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, 12:45 Dev-iL, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> In continuation to the below two threads discussing new best practice >>> proposals and the accompanying Ruff rules, >>> >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/1oh64pgco8bcbsxyyyflm7ccg1x3frol (use >>> .output instead of xcom_pull + jinja) >>> >>> - https://lists.apache.org/thread/odmymy6kn5rqx17x44ydq43c1vfqh511 >>> (replace task.branch with task.short_circuit) >>> >>> I'd like to start a lazy consensus ending in ~71h (10 AM UTC 23/03/2026) >>> to approve these proposals and move ahead according to the guidelines, >>> which means adding them to the Airflow docs and merging the associated >>> Ruff rules. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Iliya (Dev-iL) >>> >>> >>> See also: >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23583 — Ruff PR implementing >>> `airflow-xcom-pull-in-template-string` >>> >>> [2] https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/pull/23579 — Ruff PR implementing >>> `task-branch-as-short-circuit` >>> >>> >>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
