eladkal commented on code in PR #55344:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/55344#discussion_r2329456988


##########
docs/maintenance/redis.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+
+
+\# Redis Maintenance
+
+
+
+\## Introduction
+
+
+
+When running Airflow with the \*\*CeleryExecutor\*\* or 
\*\*CeleryKubernetesExecutor\*\*, Redis is often used as the message broker.

Review Comment:
   > do you think it’s worth adding a one-liner in the doc saying it was 
deprecated, or should we leave it out completely to avoid confusion?
   
   No, if we do that our docs will be impossible to maintain. When you explain 
about Redis that is "internal" detail of Celery. You should not be bothered if 
user is using `CeleryExecutor` or `CeleryKubernetesExecutor`. That is a higher 
level decision that is not part of what you are trying to solve. So the notion 
of your doc is "Assuming you are using Celery and assuming you choose Redis 
lets discuss how you maintains Redis"



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to