That's awesome , thank you everyone.

Pavan

On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 10:09 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Here are a few stats that highlight the strength and dedication of this
> community:
>
> * ✅ ~62 PRs were merged in under 4 days
> * 📆 Half of that time was over a weekend — including a long weekend in
> the US
> * This high volume of contributions helped us uncover and resolve a system
> test failure in the redis + OL
>  that might have otherwise gone unnoticed
>
> Here’s a quick look at the number of merged PRs per author:
> [image: image.png]
>
> I appreciate everyone’s participation — whether you opened PRs, reviewed
> them, or helped triage issues.
> This momentum shows what’s possible when we collaborate as a community.
>
> Looking forward to more such collaborative efforts in the future!
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:44 PM Amogh Desai <amoghde...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I recently moved `BaseHook` class into the task SDK:
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/51873. While I was doing this, we
>> were also running an effort to update `BaseOperator` imports in various
>> providers for AF3 compatibility which touched the version_compat.py and
>> created a nice import interface for that.
>>
>> As a follow up, we are seeking help from the community to migrate all
>> provider packages to use BaseHook imports via version_compat.py to
>> ensure Airflow 3.0 compatibility while maintaining backward compatibility
>> with Airflow 2.x.
>>
>> More details in: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/52676.
>>
>> Standard provider hooks have already been migrated as part of:
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/52766 which can serve as a good
>> reference point.
>>
>> Thanks in advance and looking forward to your contributions.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Amogh
>>
>

Reply via email to