+1 binding

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 8:02 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 non binding.
>
> This time my changes were around CI fixes, those are indeed present and
> it looks good.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Amogh Desai
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 3:04 AM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 binding. Checked reproducibility, signatures, checksums, licences,
> > checked that packages are installing, checked my changes - pushed the
> > 3.0.1rc1 images containing the amazon rc2 and it installed there nicely
> > together with common.messaging rc1 (after we release the providers I will
> > rebuild the images with final versions of packages for 3.0.1rc1.
> >
> > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 10:19 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ah sorry. My bad. 1.27.0 has been released this morning - it's just
> > > constraints that need to be updated.
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Unfortunately - amazon is not good - this morning this one was merged:
> > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/50126 and it adds dependency
> to
> > >> unreleased yet 1.27.0 of common.sql - so it's not possible to install
> > >> amazon provider without it - we either should revert it and produce
> rc3
> > or
> > >> release common.sql together.
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 5:57 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hey all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I have just cut the rc2 wave Airflow Providers packages. This email
> is
> > >>> calling a vote on the release, which will last for *24 hours* - which
> > >>> means
> > >>> that it will end on May 09, 2025 15:50 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1
> > >>> votes
> > >>> have been received. This is a shortened (24 hours vote) as agreed by
> > >>> policy
> > >>> set it
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/cv194w1fqqykrhswhmm54zy9gnnv6kgm
> > >>>
> > >>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
> > >>>
> > >>> Airflow Providers are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
> > >>>
> > >>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
> > >>>  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
> > >>> Provider
> > >>> distributions.
> > >>>
> > >>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
> > >>>  Python "wheel" release.
> > >>>
> > >>> The test procedure for PMC members is described in
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members
> > >>>
> > >>> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this
> RC
> > is
> > >>> described in:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDERS.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Public keys are available at:
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
> > >>>
> > >>> Please vote accordingly:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 approve
> > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > >>>
> > >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community
> > are
> > >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
> > >>>
> > >>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
> > >>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
> > >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
> > >>>
> > >>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
> > >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/50356
> > >>>
> > >>> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in
> the
> > RC
> > >>> candidates.
> > >>> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the
> > >>> documentation
> > >>> after the
> > >>> RC candidates are released.
> > >>>
> > >>> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links:
> > >>>
> > >>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/9.7.0rc2/
> > >>>
> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/6.3.0rc2/
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Elad Kalif
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to