ok. Then no consensus... Needs discussion then :) On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 8:05 PM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> A little stronger than Jed actually and for very similar reasons. > > My view is that Airflow 3 is a new foundation and I very much believe that > there will be multiple, different bundling mechanisms. > I don't think we should include the "git-provider" as a required > dependency. > > Vikram > > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:26 AM Jed Cunningham <jedcunning...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > I'm slightly against installing by default, actually. Weird from the guy > > who added bundle versioning huh? But, if I ignore the short term where we > > only have git with bundle versioning, I fully expect there will be more > > bundle options that support versioning soon, and forcing git into the mix > > just doesn't seem right long term. > > > > This is also just 1 aspect of "versioning" - bundle versioning gives you > > "dag code" consistency across a run, but you get dag versioning > regardless > > of your bundle type. It's helpful, yes, and I'd want it for production. > But > > not sure it hits the "required" bar. > > >
