+1 — coupled with the ability to do backfills in the UI now, if there is also 
want the old behaviour back on an ad-hoc basis it’s easy to get the missing 
runs created too.

-ash

> On 5 Mar 2025, at 22:26, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Looks like `[LAZY CONSENSUS]` candidate to me :)
> 
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 11:23 PM Oliveira, Niko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> +1 as well,l I've never liked the default on behaviour for this config.
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Jens Scheffler <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 5, 2025 12:54:05 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: [EXT] [DISCUSSION] Changing catchup_by_default from True to
>> False
>> 
>> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
>> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
>> the content is safe.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe.
>> Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez
>> pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que
>> le contenu ne présente aucun risque.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> +1 - I would also favor this proposal.
>> 
>> On 05.03.25 21:25, Akash Sharma wrote:
>>> +1 We should change it from both global and DAG level.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Akash
>>> 
>>> On Thu, 6 Mar, 2025, 01:01 Jed Cunningham, <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> +1, this is one of the few configs that I change from the default
>>>> immediately.
>>>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> 
>> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to