Hey everyone,

I updated our meeting notes document in the Airflow wiki to capture the
notes from our dev call on the 24th of October. Apologies for the delay.
The link for those notes is here
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=308153072#Airflow3Devcall:MeetingNotes-Summary.11>

To everyone who attended the meeting, please check the summary and add
anything that I may have missed.
For those who could not join, please let us know if you disagree with
anything discussed and agreed upon in the meeting. Also, please do ask
questions if something is unclear.

I will follow-up with the agenda for the next meeting (scheduled for 7th
Nov) in a few days. If you would like something to be added to the proposed
agenda for that meeting, please add it here
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=308153072#Airflow3Devcall:MeetingNotes-(Proposed)Agenda.1>
or
let me know.

Best regards,
Vikram

---
Below is the summary from the call on the 24th Oct:


   - Follow-up on action items from the last call:
      - Providers follow-up: Vikram Koka commented that he, Jens, Jarek,
      and others have been collaborating on a proposal document and
that it would
      be shared well before the next dev call. Vikram shared a split version of
      that document to dev list on Friday as a pre-read for the providers
      repackaging document.
      - Performance test plan: Michal Modras shared that one of his team
      members would be working on it. He said that the current
situation is that
      they have an “elastic DAG” which can be used for benchmarking various
      scenarios. He said that they would be working on the benchmark scenarios
      and sharing that document by the end of Nov. After that, the initial data
      collection based on these scenarios would be done and shared in Dec.
   - Development updates and presentations:
   - TP Chung shared a recorded video detailing the progress of AIP-74
      <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1t69Pb9BOUNGE_egnI_kIpno90RVHoO-s/view>
      on AIP-74 Introducing Data Assets
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Test+cases+AIP-74+Introducing+Data+Assets>.
      This showed the current progress on the AIP which was close to completion
      from a back-end perspective. This included the renaming of the existing
      Datasets and adding a name attribute to the asset class, to enable the
      specification of a more user-friendly name for the asset. He also shared
      that this name attribute is not currently shown in the UI, but that they
      would be working with their UI team to reflect these changes in
the Airflow
      UI.
      - Ankit Chaurasia shared an update on AIP-83 Remove Execution Date
      Unique Constraint from DAG run
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-83+Rename+execution_date+-%3E+logical_date+and+remove+unique+constraint>.
      He mentioned how this follows up on the work initially started in Airflow
      2.2 with the shift towards run_id as a unique identifier and the
      logical_date as a human usable non-unique reference. He walked
through the
      massive (around 280 files touched) draft PR focused on removing the
      execution_date completely including the CLI and the API. This PR has
      already had several comments from reviewers. The pervasiveness of the
      “execution date” was reinforced in the discussion. He mentioned
how one of
      the challenges was also with the backfill PR and was waiting for the
      backfill PR to be completed and merged. He showcased the test plan for
      testing this AIP and requested the group to review and provide
feedback on
      the test plan. He concluded that the PR is in good shape logic-wise, but
      fixing tests. The discussion after that raised the point that we need to
      upgrade the API version from v1 to v2 or v3 as part of Airflow
3, possible
      name to be “stable v3 API”.
      - Ephraim Anierobi shared an update on AIP-79 Remove Flask AppBuilder
      as Core dependency
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-79%3A+Remove+Flask+AppBuilder+as+Core+dependency>.
      It has a lot of work streams including the auth manager. Ephraim
mentioned
      how the part he was working on was the separation of the DB
migration from
      Fab. He mentioned how apps could now use an alternative mechanism called
      external DB managers to run DB migrations as part of the upgrade. He
      mentioned how this AIP included other work such as Auth manager and UI.
      Rajesh added (on behalf of Vincent) that the Auth manager was close to
      being done. Ash had also done some work on this AIP regarding 5.0 RC, but
      was not yet complete with respect to testing. Vikram expressed
concern that
      clearly multiple “necessary parts” were done as part of this AIP, but not
      clear if all the “sufficient parts” were done. Ephraim mentioned
that “what
      is left is for the UI to switch”. This needs to be followed up
in the next
      dev call. Jens suggested that we may need to migrate or reimplement the
      “Connection form UI”.
      - Ephraim Anierobi also shared an update on AIP-65 Improve DAG
      history in UI - backend changes
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-65%3A+Improve+DAG+history+in+UI>.
      He said how he is working on DAG Versioning around the serialized DAG, so
      that older versions of the DAGruns could be visible through the
UI. Ephraim
      mentioned that the serialized DAG hash is not always consistent today
      because of inconsistent sorting, which is the first thing he
just fixed. He
      also added a user-specified version for the DAG and talked about
how he is
      close to completion on the DAG history database changes. He said that the
      next steps were the API and UI work.
      - Kaxil Naik shared an update on AIP-72 Task Execution Interface aka
      Task SDK
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-72+Task+Execution+Interface+aka+Task+SDK>,
      specifically focussing on the API server. He showed the addition of the
      scaffolding for the API server, so that in the future, the Core
API and the
      execution API servers could be run independently if needed for different
      scaling requirements. He mentioned how he and Ash are working on porting
      code from Core to TaskSDK. Ash Berlin-Taylor then followed up
with sharing
      the main PR for the Task SDK, which covers the DAG object, the TaskGroup,
      the Base Operator and so on, which would be the heart of
airflow.sdk, which
      is the core Task SDK. To make upgrades easier, DAG import would stay as
      “airflow.dag”, so people don’t even get any deprecation warnings. Ash
      mentioned how he was currently thinking of including this
“airflow.sdk” in
      the Scheduler to avoid reimplementation, but was still thinking
through the
      implications. He mentioned how a lot of the classes are now using “attrs”
      to save on boilerplate code. Ash mentioned how the next step is to start
      adding endpoints for the API server to start doing simple client-based
      execution.
      - Brent Bovenzi finished up the call with an update on designs for AIP-38
      Modern Web Application
      
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-38+Modern+Web+Application>
by
      walking through mockups of the redesigned DAG details page, including a
      list of actions / filters to show only failed tasks, etc. Brent
also walked
      through the mockups for DAGruns view for Gantt chart view vs. Graph view,
      etc. Brent showed how the modal view enables a quick view of the
details of
      a DA run and to switch between different areas which a user may want to
      drill into. Brent mentioned how the motivation was to enable
proper use of
      space and to zoom between a DAG and a DAGrun and TaskInstance, without
      having to show a giant Christmas tree of the grid view.
   - Action items for next call:
      -

      Vikram to update the development milestones doc based on the
      performance benchmark plan from Michal  - DONE
      - Vikram to create a subpage under Airflow 3.0 to track critical
      changes important for upgrades, including API changes such as
those brought
      up in the Execution date removal discussion. API owners to
update this page
      as they make user facing changes during development.
      - Ephraim, Vincent, and others interested to follow-up on "What's
      left for AIP-79" and present at the next dev call.

Reply via email to