If you are still looking for answers Daniel (just got to that message from my backlog):
Yes. That sounds good. On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 6:36 PM Daniel Standish <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Ok want to focus the discussion on one question. > > Proposal: > DAG.max_active_runs will apply to non-backfill dag runs and will *not* > apply > to backfill dag runs. > Backfill.max_active_runs is a required param for backfills and is evaluated > entirely separately from DAG.max_active_runs. In other words, > DAG.max_active_runs is not considered at all for dag runs that are part of > a backfill. Only the max_active_runs for that backfill is considered. > > Sound good? >
