Oh. I don't think we want to "vote" on it (but I will let David to chime in because I was mostly guessing what's his expectation and worries are).
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 1:07 AM Vikram Koka <vik...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > Hmm, I can think of a different solution to the problem here as well, but I > could be misunderstanding the problem. > > I understand that producing a full AIP may be frustrating, but I don't feel > confident enough in my understanding that I can vote on this at this time. > I do think a "light AIP" in the form of a Google doc or equivalent would be > helpful. > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 2:58 PM Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > Yeah I agree with Jens here. I think it makes sense to produce an AIP so > > people can understand the proposal better. We can't really give a thumbs > > up or down without a proposal. At least it's not like python where you > > have to implement the whole thing first :) > > >
