I’m wondering why do we want to remove this. The design seems to be reasonable, but yep, it might not be as helpful as mentioned.
> is it useful to have it take up a slot at the first and last couple seconds of its lifecycle? methinks no. Some edge cases “might” be helpful. I guess? A deferrable operator that’s not (or could not) implemented well probably need it. My main question is whether this configuration is causing confusion or complicating logic in the code base? Otherwise, we probably could just keep it? Best, Wei > On Oct 10, 2024, at 9:05 PM, Daniel Standish > <daniel.stand...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote: > > No worries. The other issue is good to know about. Just I'm trying to > keep the discussion focused on the main question. > > People don't have a lot of excess time to attend to things like this and > weigh in. We're lucky if we get 3 people to weigh in on a discussion item > like this. > > So, I'm interested in your opinion. Given that you've apparently thought > about the general topic, that's valuable. So I want to invite you to think > about it and to share your take on it, or share that you don't have an > opinion on it.
