What about primary provider? בתאריך יום ו׳, 16 באוג׳ 2024, 16:49, מאת Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>:
> I also think "core" is not the best one as we are using "airflow core" as a > different meaning already (that's another example of Ash's "one thing > to mean in Airflow") . I still think "common.operators" would be a good > name, but I am not insisting on "common", still I think "providers.time" > is too granular (that would be a good name - but for reasons explained > above, I think it's better to have "one" such provider with all the basic > operators). > > Speaking of which, how would "*apache-airflow-providers-basic-operators*" > sound ? I think "Base" is also used in airflow for different things - > extendability rather than reusability. > > And yes - the extra provider will be pre-installed - so no need to install > anything extra from the user's point of view.. Main benefit of having it in > a separate provider will be that it will be separately upgradeable - no > need to upgrade airflow to get new features of PythonOperator for example. > > > J > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 12:50 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Oh yes 100%. Such a core/base/whatever provider would be a dependency of > > apache-airflow, much like the http provider is today, so no extra deps > > would need to be specified by the users. > > > > On 16 August 2024 11:28:18 BST, Bas Harenslak <b...@astronomer.io.INVALID > > > > wrote: > > >“core” sounds conflicting to me because a providers package is not part > > of the core. I understand the desire to strip out more operators/sensor > > from the core Airflow package for maintainability purposes, but would > > prefer to be able to run a bare minimum example DAG without having to > > install additional provider packages. > > > > > >My suggestion is therefore to keep several key operators/sensors, e.g. > > Bash/Python/EmptyOperator, and I'd be fine with putting everything else > in > > a “common" provider. > > > > > >Bas > > > > > >> On 16 Aug 2024, at 11:52, Pierre Jeambrun <pierrejb...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I also like core > > >> > > >> Le ven. 16 août 2024 à 11:48, rom sharon <rom.sharo...@gmail.com> a > > écrit : > > >> > > >>> +1 for “core” > > >>> > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > >
