Hi all, regarding the discussion and vote around Provider for Apache Airflow, I have updated the github issue: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37628 with more information of why I am proposing to implement this provider, and in what way the users can use it to instrument their DAG's. Originally I was planning to provide more information in the PR (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/37989), but it looked like I had closed the PR previously and cannot reopen it. I would like to reopen another PR for this work should the voting goes through and the proposal is approved by the community.
Please let me know if there's any more questions or comments. Howard On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:17 PM Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, got it. > I'll put some more details. Thanks! > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 6:46 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > >> Yeah. I think - as discussed in the discussion, some visualisation and >> example what the provider will allow would be useful, because it's hard to >> understand it as OTEL is very new concept for us. >> >> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 5:49 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi Howard, >> > >> > It's not clear to me what we are actually voting on here. Could you >> > elaborate please? >> > >> > >> > >> > On 12 August 2024 23:57:57 BST, Howard Yoo <howard...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >Fellow Airflowers, >> > > >> > >I would like to start the voting process for OTEL providers for airflow >> > >mentioned in previous discussion in this dev mailing list here: >> > >https://lists.apache.org/thread/l0m06llz171m5yhqd016pv58sh5wnqmr >> > > >> > >The voting will last at least for 72 hours, until Friday 10:00 am CST >> > time. >> > > >> > >Please vote accordingly: >> > > >> > >[ ] +1 approve >> > >[ ] +0 no opinion >> > >[ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> > > >> > >Only votes from PMC members are binding, but all members of the >> community >> > >are encouraged to vote with "(non-binding)". >> > > >> > >Thank you for your interest in this feature. >> > > >> > >Regards, >> > >Howard >> > >> >
