The auto labelling would be a great idea as it would ensure that issues are promptly classified without depending too much on the triage team.
Regards, Poorvi On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 14:54, Ankit Chaurasia <sunank...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1. Love this idea. > > *Ankit Chaurasia* > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 3:00 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > The current idea we have, how we could still benefit from having AI/Bot > > generated answers, is for maintainers and possibly triage teams to be > able > > to review the proposed answers and "approve" them before they are posted. > > Such an answer might then be marked as "bot/automatically/AI generated" > but > > it will also get a "Maintainer approved" or "Triage team approved" badge, > > This way anyone can see that the answer was reviewed by a > maintainer/triage > > team member. This way we can get way more efficiency in handling issues > > (time for reviewing answers will be far less than writing it). Also > > maintainers/triage team members will be able to correct the answers if > they > > are misleading / wrong. Who approved/corrected it will be visible for the > > triage/maintainer team in the DoSu interface, but not seen in the Github > UI > > who actually approved/corrected it. > > > > Love this! One thing we need to be a little sure of is the "honesty" > while > > answering these bot suggestions, at least > > initially, so that the bot settles well into our ecosystem. > > > > I am happy with the direction this is heading into > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Amogh Desai > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 1:31 PM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > +1 for this idea. I remember we had this discussion during PyCon US, > > haha. > > > > > > So, in the first phase, we'll need a maintainer's approval before the > AI > > > response is sent. I'm not sure whether this will be a burden to > > > maintainers. I'm thinking of adding a label to that AI response answer; > > the > > > user can decide whether to accept that even before the maintainers' > > > approval. If maintainers check the response and it's ok, they can > remove > > > that label. > > > > > > Best, > > > Wei > > > > > > > On Jun 27, 2024, at 3:07 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> I guess it's too early to discuss what the workflow we're picturing > > for > > > it > > > >> is. But I would like it if a reporter is unable to see the comment > > until > > > >> it's approved (which I guess is exactly what you're also suggesting > > > Jarek). > > > >> > > > > > > > > Absolutely. Actually - we (few of maintainers) can already see the > > > answers > > > > generated in a DoSU interface as "drafts" - and once we enable > > labelling > > > we > > > > can on-board more maintainers and triage team and work with DoSu team > > on > > > > implementing a workflow that might be good to start with. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
