Let me see if we can get you access On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 8:45 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was trying on a rough POC but it looks like I need to deploy my > application against a webserver on the internet. > > I also do not have the access to create a private channel on Airflow Slack. > > Thanks & Regards, > Amogh Desai > > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 9:43 AM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thank you, I will try to work on some POC soon > > > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 10:47 PM Briana Okyere > > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > > >> Would love your help on this Amogh! > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 9:40 PM Amogh Desai <amoghdesai....@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Let us try to summarise and see what the bot has to do. Summarising: > >> > 1. The bot should allow users to report issues - anonymously too (or > >> maybe > >> > an option) > >> > 2. These issues should get redirected to an admin channel / private > >> channel > >> > 3. Some command in the bot that could allow users to find out the > >> people in > >> > that channel so that they can be contacted > >> > privately too > >> > > >> > Havent deployed a bot ever, but would be willing to try > >> > > >> > Thanks & Regards, > >> > Amogh Desai > >> > > >> > On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:58 AM Briana Okyere > >> > <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I agree with the bot idea- does anyone on this thread have the > >> ability to > >> > > implement it? > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 8:58 AM Bishundeo, Rajeshwar > >> > > <rbish...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > The bot idea is great and being able to be anonymous is important! > >> I'm > >> > > not > >> > > > a fan of filling out forms and that could be a deterrent for > people > >> > > trying > >> > > > expressing their concerns, especially if they misinterpret the > form > >> > > > structure/criteria. So def in favor of a #2 type approach with a > >> bot. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- Rajesh > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On 2024-02-05, 10:13 AM, "Jarek Potiuk" <ja...@potiuk.com > <mailto: > >> > > > ja...@potiuk.com>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. > Do > >> not > >> > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender > >> and > >> > > know > >> > > > the content is safe. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur > >> > externe. > >> > > > Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous > ne > >> > > pouvez > >> > > > pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas > >> certain > >> > > que > >> > > > le contenu ne présente aucun risque. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I think the bot would be best. It would be great if the reports > are > >> > made > >> > > to > >> > > > a private channel (the bot that Andrey posted seems to be doing > just > >> > > that) > >> > > > where it can be discussed between the admin channels and action > >> taken. > >> > > Plus > >> > > > some way of knowing who is in the admin channel and invitation to > >> > contact > >> > > > them privately in case someone feels it's not good to post to the > >> > channel > >> > > > (reasons explained before). > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > J. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2024 at 1:42 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com > >> <mailto: > >> > > > weilee...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I believe that anonymity is important in this case. It would be > >> great > >> > > if > >> > > > > we could have the bot suggested by Aritra, and option #2 is > >> > favorable. > >> > > > > Alternatively, I would prefer option #1. Thanks! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > Wei Lee > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Feb 4, 2024, at 12:37 AM, Aritra Basu < > >> aritrabasu1...@gmail.com > >> > > > <mailto:aritrabasu1...@gmail.com>> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm very much for anonymity here, so if we could have some > kind > >> of > >> > > bot > >> > > > > > that'd be great. Though even without that I think the > >> combination > >> > of > >> > > > > > channel and form also works out fine for talking to a person > vs > >> > > wanting > >> > > > > > anonymity. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > Regards, > >> > > > > > Aritra Basu > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024, 9:12 PM Andrey Anshin < > >> > andrey.ans...@taragol.is > >> > > > <mailto:andrey.ans...@taragol.is>> > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> I’m also for some bot/application, after quick search I’ve > >> found > >> > > this > >> > > > > one > >> > > > > >> https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool < > >> > > > https://github.com/slackapi/slack-reporting-tool> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> I’m not sure is it suits our requirements and it required > >> instance > >> > > > where > >> > > > > >> this code would be deployed but it worthwhile to check it, > >> > > especially > >> > > > if > >> > > > > >> someone familiar with Typescript > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > >>> On 3 Feb 2024, at 19:19, Amogh Desai < > >> amoghdesai....@gmail.com > >> > > > <mailto:amoghdesai....@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> I would also like to go with #2. > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> But just to bring up, how easy / hard is it to have a slack > >> bot > >> > > that > >> > > > > >> users > >> > > > > >>> can use to report > >> > > > > >>> bad users or spam users. Never done it before myself, but it > >> > would > >> > > > be a > >> > > > > >>> great interface to report issues. > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> The issues would then come to few admins who can take > >> regulatory > >> > > > > action. > >> > > > > >>> (Might be an overkill, but thinking out loud here) > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>> Thanks & Regards, > >> > > > > >>> Amogh Desai > >> > > > > >>> > >> > > > > >>>> On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 2:55 AM Briana Okyere > >> > > > > >>>> <briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva <mailto: > >> > > > briana.oky...@astronomer.io.inva>lid> wrote: > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Hey All, > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> I'm breaking this out into another conversation because I > >> think > >> > it > >> > > > > >> warrants > >> > > > > >>>> its own decision before we move forward. > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Last week, I proposed we add a code of conduct for Airflow > >> Slack > >> > > and > >> > > > > >>>> in-person meetups. > >> > > > > >>>> Thread: < > >> > > > > >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87> > >> > < > >> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/jy16tb09qoc7lxb03pdj3dfnmrsmjq87> > >> ;> > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> In the Code of Conduct I shared, there is a conversation > >> taking > >> > > > place > >> > > > > >> about > >> > > > > >>>> HOW to report someone in Slack if their message does not > >> abide > >> > by > >> > > > the > >> > > > > >> code > >> > > > > >>>> of conduct. > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> There is a general consensus that a committee should be > >> formed > >> > > that > >> > > > > >> people > >> > > > > >>>> can report code of conduct violations to. > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Two options were proposed about the reporting process: > >> > > > > >>>> 1. Create a google form that people can fill out > anonymously > >> to > >> > > > report > >> > > > > >> code > >> > > > > >>>> of conduct violations > >> > > > > >>>> 2. Create a channel in slack called #slack-admins where > >> people > >> > can > >> > > > > post > >> > > > > >> and > >> > > > > >>>> report a violation. > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> I would like to know which option you all vote for. I vote > >> for > >> > > > option > >> > > > > >> #2. > >> > > > > >>>> With the addition that we should have a #slack-admins > channel > >> > that > >> > > > > >> links to > >> > > > > >>>> the google form for anonymous reporting, but also serves > as a > >> > > space > >> > > > > >> where > >> > > > > >>>> people can post questions about the code of conduct and > >> receive > >> > > > > clarity > >> > > > > >> and > >> > > > > >>>> answers. But I strongly feel there should be an option to > >> > > > anonymously > >> > > > > >>>> report, which I think a form would solve. > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> Curious what others think, or if you have additional ideas! > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >>>> --- > >> > > > > >>>> Briana Okyere > >> > > > > >>>> Community Manager > >> > > > > >>>> Astronomer > >> > > > > >>>> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > >> <mailto: > >> > > > dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org> > >> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >> > <mailto: > >> > > > dev-h...@airflow.apache.org> > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > >> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
