+1 (non-binding) Ran some dags and it worked fine!
On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:55 AM Wei Lee <weilee...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Tested my changes with our example DAG without encountering error > > Best, > Wei > > > On Jan 31, 2024, at 6:34 AM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > +1 (binding) - checked reproducibility, licences, signatures, checksums - > > all good. > > > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:42 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hey all, > >> > >> I have just cut an ad-hoc release for the microsoft.azure provider > package. > >> This email is calling a vote on the release, > >> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on February > 02, > >> 2024 16:40 PM UTC and until 3 binding +1 votes have been received. > >> > >> > >> Consider this my (binding) +1. > >> > >> Airflow Providers are available at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/ > >> > >> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary > >> Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the > provider > >> packages. > >> > >> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary > >> Python "wheel" release. > >> > >> The test procedure for PMC members is described in > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-pmc-members > >> > >> The test procedure for and Contributors who would like to test this RC > is > >> described in: > >> > >> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors > >> > >> > >> Public keys are available at: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS > >> > >> Please vote accordingly: > >> > >> [ ] +1 approve > >> [ ] +0 no opinion > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason > >> > >> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community > are > >> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". > >> > >> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string. > >> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying > >> the artifact checksums when we actually release. > >> > >> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here: > >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/37102 > >> > >> The issue is also the easiest way to see important PRs included in the > RC > >> candidates. > >> Detailed changelog for the providers will be published in the > documentation > >> after the > >> RC candidates are released. > >> > >> You can find the RC packages in PyPI following these links: > >> > >> > https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/9.0.0rc1/ > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Elad Kalif > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org > >
