Thank you for the clarification! > However, I just had an idea which we can try out for future releases 👍
I wonder if we can exclude the file from rat check and revert that once you implement and validate your idea: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/34717. On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:43 PM Jed Cunningham <j...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote: > > the `Chart.yaml` file which does not have a license > > Quirk of helm ultimately. The source tarball does have the license, just > the convenience package tarball is missing it - helm processes the file and > removes the comment when it packages the chart. It's been this way forever > unfortunately. > > However, I just had an idea which we can try out for future releases 👍 >
