Absolutely +1 On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 7:20 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 binding > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 15:16, Michał Modras <[email protected] > .invalid> > wrote: > > > +1 - let's avoid forcing users to modify their DAGs > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 7:19 PM Vikram Koka <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (with emphasis) > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 5:23 AM Ephraim Anierobi < > > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2023 at 6:57 AM Elad Kalif <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 binding > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 9:32 PM Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote doesn't say the release must happen, just that it can > > > > happen. > > > > > > The final decision on when to release is still up to the release > > > > manager. > > > > > > > > > > > > Correct. It's on Ephraim's shoulders to decide :) (No pressure > > > Ephraim > > > > ;) > > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 8:14 PM Ash Berlin-Taylor < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > +100 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vote doesn't say the release must happen, just that it can > > > > happen. > > > > > > The > > > > > > > final decision on when to release is still up to the release > > > manager. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12 August 2023 18:36:13 BST, Jarek Potiuk <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >Hello everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I would like to raise a vote about modifying the result of > vote > > > from > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/4dkbwob1wyl3xjbqdsmbd1mvgzflzp1f. > > > > and > > > > > > > >RESTORE dagrun.conf UI option for triggering DAGs in 2.7.0 > > (which > > > > > means > > > > > > > >preparing RC2). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I am writing that in the name of the release-management > > > "concilium": > > > > > > > >Ephraim, Hussein, Elad, Jens, Pankaj Koti, Rahul Vats, myself > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >We discussed it today at the #release-management channel about > > the > > > > > > problem > > > > > > > >with dagrun.conf functionality removal from 2.7.0 "Trigger > UI". > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/C03G9H97MM2/p1691833923538419 > > > > > > . > > > > > > > >It's been also raised as concern by Hussein in the original PR > > and > > > > the > > > > > > > >[VOTE] thread for 2.7.0rc1 > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/pc89dh43kmpj267rpospo1lk5j3j6qkl > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I think we all unanimously agree that removal of that > > > functionality > > > > is > > > > > > > >practically breaking change for many of our users, who will > have > > > no > > > > > > choice > > > > > > > >but to modify their DAGs and add param definitions to their > DAGs > > > if > > > > > they > > > > > > > >want to continue triggering their DAGs via UI. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >While it is a good thing to do and this was the original > > > intention, > > > > > > > >to "push" our users in this direction, we realised that we do > > not > > > > give > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >users a viable alternative and that effort required to rewrite > > > their > > > > > > DAGs > > > > > > > >might be far too much and might be a huge blocker to 2.7 > > adoption. > > > > The > > > > > > > >"push" seems to be rather brutal and forceful, not a gentle > one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >We did not realise this consequence when we - as a community - > > > ran > > > > > the > > > > > > > >previous vote, but we now think releasing 2.7.0 without this > > > option > > > > > will > > > > > > > >cause a lot of problems. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Since we all share such a unanimous view, we propose (and > > Ephraim > > > > is > > > > > > > going > > > > > > > >to do so) cancel RC1 and Jens already has PRs that should > > restore > > > > the > > > > > > > >functionality. PR is shortly coming. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >However, that requires modifying the results of the previous > > vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Consider that my binding +1 vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >We want to accelerate the voting a bit and we also propose to > > > > produce > > > > > an > > > > > > > >RC2 with the option restored to accelerate the process and not > > to > > > > > delay > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >2.7.0 release too much. I propose this vote to last till 10 am > > > > Tuesday > > > > > > > 26th > > > > > > > >CEST - that should give enough time for everyone including > the > > > > > weekend > > > > > > > >time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >J. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
