option a (non-binding)

--
Sent from Canary (https://canarymail.io)

> On Saturday, Jul 29, 2023 at 20:41, Pierre Jeambrun <pierrejb...@gmail.com 
> (mailto:pierrejb...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> Option a
>
> On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 22:39, Hussein Awala <huss...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> > I vote for option a
> >
> > On Sat 29 Jul 2023 at 21:57, Ash Berlin-Taylor <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Option a.
> > >
> > > _ash
> > >
> > > On 29 July 2023 19:25:28 BST, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to resume the vote discussed last week whether we should
> > > > pre-install or not the three providers bringing the new executors.
> > > >
> > > > Most of the discussion happened in
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0d9x4kl7hc2qzvho2mbdf35ohn5w12l6
> > > > [DISCUSS} and
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/sdbqft19q7g35grlzsyv13mg5f5xqmpv
> > > > [VOTE] - cancelled about the dask provider, but during the discussion it
> > > > was pretty clear that we should treat the three providers in the same
> > > > way. This vote is about all three of them.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote:
> > > >
> > > > [a] - if you think the providers to be regular ones, not preinstalled
> > > > [b] - if you think the providers to be pre-installed
> > > >
> > > > [0] - no opinion
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Consider my voice as [a] - I think that all three providers should not
> > > > be preinstalled.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will last till Tuesday 1st of August 8pm CEST
> > > >
> > > > Here https://pasteboard.co/Me7zfcz3XR0j.png is also a screenshot
> > > > showing what message is now printed if a user would like to use one of
> > > > those executors and the right provider is not installed (it's been
> > > > raised as a condition for not pre-installing the providers).
> > > >
> > > > J.
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@airflow.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@airflow.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to