I'd also be happy to help out with this effort. We've been interested in improving the quality of signals produced by Airflow for a while - they are critical for making task failure easier and more accessible.
Let me know once the plan is updated, I will be happy to pick up some work! On Sat, Jan 28, 2023, 12:22 AM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > I know Howard (AIP creator) was looking for developers to assist on this. > Howard - Can you share status/progress? > > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 12:50 AM Ferruzzi, Dennis > <ferru...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: > >> Third time’s the charm? >> >> Hi folks, looks like AIP-49 [1] hasn’t been touched in a while and I am >> interested in getting it implemented. If nobody has any objections, I’m >> going to start coming up with a plan to get this one done in the next >> little while. The last PoC for it was almost a year ago - and we all know >> how much has changed since then - so I'm starting with getting that PoC up >> and running locally and I'll go from there. >> >> If nobody objects, I'll be getting that PoC working and then maybe set up >> a planning board? Once I have the PoC running I'll likely have a few >> tweaks to the AIP. Is that possible given that it has already been voted >> on? >> >> [1] >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-49+OpenTelemetry+Support+for+Apache+Airflow >> >>
