+1 non-binding I love how easy it is for me to plug my own requirement in Airflow without touching the core Airflow. This would definitely be a great improvement.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:54 PM Elad Kalif <elad...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 binding > This would be a great improvement! > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:32 AM Robert Karish <robertkar...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Looks like a great improvement! >> >> Best, >> Robert >> >> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Ping Zhang <pin...@umich.edu> wrote: >> >>> +1 binding. >>> >>> Thanks for proposing this work. It will lead to a cleaner interface. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ping >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 1:07 PM Oliveira, Niko >>> <oniko...@amazon.com.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> Hey folks! >>>> >>>> I would like to start a vote for "AIP-51 - Removing Executor Coupling >>>> from Core Airlfow". >>>> >>>> You can find the AIP here: >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-51+Removing+Executor+Coupling+from+Core+Airlfow >>>> >>>> Discussion threads: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/yd4tcgyqft664dt8clgx48gyvfzddnjh >>>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions/27241 >>>> >>>> The voting will last for 6 days (until 21th of November 2022, 2:00pm >>>> PST), and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast. >>>> >>>> Please vote accordingly: >>>> >>>> [ ] + 1 approve >>>> [ ] + 0 no opinion >>>> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason >>>> >>>> Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other >>>> members of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with >>>> "(non-binding)". >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> >>>>
