Would love PMC votes so that I can release it tomorrow - just before
heading for holidays :)

On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:35 PM Pankaj Koti
<pankaj.k...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:

> +1 non-binding.
>
> Tested both the RCs. They install fine and our DAGs using the providers
> are running fine.
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Pankaj Koti
>
> *Senior Software Engineer, *OSS Engineering Team.
> Location: Pune, India
>
> Timezone: Indian Standard Time (IST)
>
> Email: pankaj.k...@astronomer.io
>
> Mobile: +91 9730079985
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:25 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
>> calling a vote on the release,
>> which will last for 72 hours - which means that it will end on Friday 7th
>> of October 11am CDT.
>>
>> Consider this my (binding) +1.
>>
>> Those are RC2 candidates of google and slack providers after fixes to
>> errors found in RC1 have been implemented and merged.
>>
>> Airflow Providers are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/providers/
>>
>> *apache-airflow-providers-<PROVIDER>-*.tar.gz* are the binary
>>  Python "sdist" release - they are also official "sources" for the
>> provider packages.
>>
>> *apache_airflow_providers_<PROVIDER>-*.whl are the binary
>>  Python "wheel" release.
>>
>> The test procedure for PMC members who would like to test the RC
>> candidates are described in
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-the-release-by-pmc-members
>>
>> and for Contributors:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_PROVIDER_PACKAGES.md#verify-by-contributors
>>
>>
>> Public keys are available at:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS
>>
>> Please vote accordingly:
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>>
>>
>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community are
>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)".
>>
>> Please note that the version number excludes the 'rcX' string.
>> This will allow us to rename the artifact without modifying
>> the artifact checksums when we actually release.
>>
>> The status of testing the providers by the community is kept here:
>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26864
>>
>> You can find packages as well as detailed changelog following the below
>> links:
>>
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/8.4.0rc2/
>> https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-slack/6.0.0rc2/
>>
>> Cheers,
>> J.
>>
>>

Reply via email to