Thanks Kaxil for uploading the key :). All signatures are GOOD :) On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 1:07 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> wrote:
> +1 (but). > > > - Tested: 2.7, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 3.8 with various combinations of > postgres/mysql/sqlite/rbac/non-rbac. > - Verified: RAT check of the sources passes > - MD5 sums all match. > - I have one last problem with the signature (but it can be easily > solved) > > The release is signed with 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B key > which is registered at Apache all right ( > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/KEYS) but it's the one > here: > > -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- > pub rsa2048 2019-08-30 [SC] [expires: 2021-08-29] > 12717556040EEF2EEAF1B9C275FCCD0A25FA0E4B > uid [ultimate] Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> > sig 3 75FCCD0A25FA0E4B 2019-08-30 Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> > sub rsa2048 2019-08-30 [E] [expires: 2021-08-29] > sig 75FCCD0A25FA0E4B 2019-08-30 Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> > > And I have hard time retrieving it form the MIT keyserver (it has never > been reliably working !). Is there any other keyserver you have your public > key uploaded? > I can recommend this one > http://keys.gnupg.net/ > > Is it possible that you submit your key there so that I can verify it :) ? > > J > > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:43 PM Deng Xiaodong <xd.den...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Thanks a lot, Kaxil, for taking care of the release. And thanks to all >> contributors. >> >> +1 from me. >> >> # Environment >> - Run with Docker-compose >> - Python 3.6.10 >> - Postgres 12.2 >> - LocalExecutor >> >> # What's Tested >> - Run DAGs with CRON schedule and “None” schedule >> - Create users with Viewer or Op roles, and test corresponding accesses. >> - Delete DAGs >> - A few changes that I didn’t have time to validate during 1.10.11 >> release (#8663, #8655, #8742, #8719, etc) >> >> # Minor Issue >> - I notice #8692 (https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8692 < >> https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8692>, which was marked milestone >> 1.10.11) was not included in either 1.10.11 or 1.10.12rc1. Given it’s a >> very simple change which does not affect/block anything, I would like to >> suggest: if there is rc2 for 1.10.12 later (I do not hope so though), let’s >> include #8692 into 1.10.12; otherwise we can update its milestone to >> 1.10.13. >> >> Thanks again! >> >> >> XD >> >> >> > On 15 Aug 2020, at 11:16 PM, Daniel Imberman <daniel.imber...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > +1! >> > >> > On Sat, Aug 15, 2020, 1:38 PM Jarek Potiuk <jarek.pot...@polidea.com> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Cool! Will take a look tomorrow ! >> >> >> >> sob., 15 sie 2020, 19:05 użytkownik Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> >> >> napisał: >> >> >> >>> Hello Apache Airflow Community, >> >>> >> >>> This is a call for the vote to release Apache Airflow version 1.10.12. >> >>> >> >>> The release candidate: >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/airflow/1.10.12rc1/ >> >>> >> >>> *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc1-source.tar.gz* is a source release that >> comes >> >>> with INSTALL instructions. >> >>> *apache-airflow-1.10.12rc1-bin.tar.gz* is the binary Python "sdist" >> >>> snapshot. >> >>> *apache_airflow-1.10.12rc1-py3-none-any.whl* is the binary Python >> wheel >> >>> snapshot. >> >>> >> >>> Public keys are available at: >> https://www.apache.org/dist/airflow/KEYS >> >>> >> >>> For convenience, RC is also uploaded on PyPI so you can install it >> using >> >>> *pip install apache-airflow==1.10.12rc1* >> >>> >> >>> The Change Log for the release: >> >>> https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/1.10.12rc1/CHANGELOG.txt >> >>> >> >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (2020-08-18 17:10 UTC) or >> >> until >> >>> the necessary number >> >>> of votes are reached. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> https://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/to?iso=20200818T1810&p0=136&font=cursive >> >>> >> >>> Please vote accordingly: >> >>> >> >>> [ ] +1 approve >> >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >> >>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason >> >>> >> >>> Only votes from PMC members are binding, but members of the community >> are >> >>> encouraged to test the release and vote with "(non-binding)". >> >>> >> >>> Please note that the version number excludes the `rcX` string, so it's >> >> now >> >>> simply 1.10.12. This will allow us to rename the artifact without >> >> modifying >> >>> the artifact checksums when we actually release. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Kaxil Naik >> >>> >> >> >> >> > > -- > > Jarek Potiuk > Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer > > M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> > [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/> > > -- Jarek Potiuk Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
