Forgot to mention, having them in separate repo also helps in better managing each individual artifacts.
Each repo would have a separate Github Issue where we can track the issue specific to Helm chart or Dockerfile. Regards, Kaxil On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:30 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: > The PMC also needs to agree if we want separate VOTING for Docker Image > and Helm chart, I think we do. > > Regards, > Kaxil > > On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 8:06 PM Kaxil Naik <kaxiln...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> What do you all think about having Dockerfile and Helm chart in the same >> "Airflow" Repo vs separate? >> >> I feel having a separate repo for Airflow Dockerfile and Helm chart have >> more benefits like easy to track changes (via Changelog), easy for new >> contributors, separate release cadence. >> >> Currently, docker file and Helm Chart are inside the same repo and when >> we release changelog for a new Airflow version, it would include all >> changes (Airflow + Dockerfile + Helm chart) which I think is not that great. >> >> Also having them all inside a single repo means changes in Helm Chart and >> Dockerfile can block Airflow release. We could use stable Helm Chart >> version and Dockerfile version to test Airflow so that they are blockers to >> release too. >> >> Happy to hear the thoughts from the community. >> >> Regards, >> Kaxil >> >
