This sounds pretty good to me. I agree there was a reason at the moment where it made sense, since we didn't even support the most basic use cases (only the parsing bits were there IIRC).
But now I guess it makes sense to un-mark as experimental all the flexbox properties we actually use in layout (even though there will still be a lot of bugs). This would also be useful to allow more people to fill flexbox issues :) Cheers: Emilio On 09/30/2016 03:26 AM, Patrick Walton wrote: > Hi, > > Given stshine's fantastic work implementing flexbox, I'm wondering whether > it's worth turning it on by default now. At the very least, I think turning > it on should be easier than flipping nearly a dozen preferences. :) > > Flexbox is getting pretty important in rendering the Web (see [1] for an > example), and in my (admittedly limited) experience Servo's implementation > of that spec isn't that much less Web-compatible than our implementations > of CSS 2 and CSS 3. > > Thoughts? > > Patrick > > [1]: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/13494 > _______________________________________________ > dev-servo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
