There's some minor work needed for DevTools (making sure that we show the color swatch for the color parameter). I filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038889 for this
On Friday, May 8, 2026 at 4:28:01 PM UTC+2 Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > Summary: Implement the CSS image() function, restricted to its <color> > form. It produces a solid-color image with no natural dimensions and is > exactly equivalent to linear-gradient(<color>), but is more direct > > As part of the same change, none inside light-dark() now computes to > image(transparent), matching the recent CSSWG resolution[1]. > > Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038136 > Specification: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-images-4/#image-notation > Standards Body: CSSWG. > Platform Coverage: All > Preference: enabled by default, because we're changing the behavior of > none in `light-dark()` and it'd get messy. > DevTools Bug: N/A > Extensions Bug: N/A > Use Counter: Not planned. The feature is a syntactic alias for > linear-gradient(<color>), so it's mostly useful to avoid the > light-dark(none, none) annoyance > Standards-Positions Discussion: None (trivial-ish) > Other Browsers: > - Blink: They filed the relevant issue, so presumably they'll update > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7806112. > - WebKit: No signal yet. > > web-platform-tests: Coverage added as part of this work. > > [1]: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/13866 > > Thanks, > --Emilio > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "[email protected]" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/d/msgid/dev-platform/3032add8-425c-4889-bd91-68d6ddc3eeden%40mozilla.org.
