On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 1:15:42 PM UTC-5, grze...@gmail.com wrote:
> Carsten Grzemba schrieb am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021 um 14:25:41 UTC+1: 
> > Lars Hansen schrieb am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021 um 13:25:45 UTC+1: 
> > > If you run jit-tests with the options -f --no-xdr it will print out the 
> > > command lines you need to use to run the failed tests individually. 
> > > 
> > > --lrs 
> > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:05 PM Carsten Grzemba <grze...@gmail.com> 
> > > wrote: 
> > > 
> > > > I attempt to build Firefox for Openindiana (Illumos). Some of the tests 
> > > > are failing: 
> > > > Result summary: 
> > > > Passed: 30561 
> > > > Failed: 480 
> > > > 
> > > > How can I check what the reason for a failed check is? 
> > > > 
> > > > In the log I see for example: 
> > > > TEST-PASS | js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/timeout/debug-interrupt-2.js | 
> > > > Success (code 6, args "--ion-eager --ion-offthread-compile=off 
> > > > --more-compartments") [1.0 s] 
> > > > #1 module successfully instantiated: PASS. 
> > > > #2 A wast module that must return a particular value.: PASS. 
> > > > #3 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > #4 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > #5 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > #6 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > Exit code: -11 
> > > > FAIL - wasm/spec/memory_grow.wast.js 
> > > > TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | 
> > > > js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/spec/memory_grow.wast.js 
> > > > | Unknown (code -11, args "--ion-eager --ion-offthread-compile=off 
> > > > --ion-check-range-analysis --ion-extra-checks --no-sse3 --no-threads") 
> > > > [20.0 s] 
> > > > INFO exit-status : -11 
> > > > INFO timed-out : False 
> > > > INFO stdout > #1 module successfully instantiated: PASS. 
> > > > INFO stdout > #2 A wast module that must return a particular 
> > > > value.: PASS. 
> > > > INFO stdout > #3 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > INFO stdout > #4 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > INFO stdout > #5 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > INFO stdout > #6 A wast module that must trap at runtime.: PASS. 
> > > > 
> > > > TEST-PASS | js/src/jit-test/tests/wasm/timeout/1.js | Success (code 6, 
> > > > args "--wasm-compiler=baseline") [1.2 s] 
> > > > 
> > > > How can I run a test standalone, perhapse with a little bit more 
> > > > informations? 
> > > > _______________________________________________ 
> > > > dev-platform mailing list 
> > > > dev-pl...@lists.mozilla.org 
> > > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform 
> > > > 
> > cool! 
> > thats is what Im looking for: 
> > 
> > grzemba@oibuild:~/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test$
> >  /ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/build_opt/amd64/dist/bin/js 
> > -f 
> > /ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test/lib/prologue.js
> >  -e 'const platform='"'"'sunos5'"'"'' -e 'const 
> > libdir='"'"'/ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test/lib/'"'"''
> >  -e 'const 
> > scriptdir='"'"'/ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test/tests/asm.js/'"'"''
> >  -e 'if ((!this.SharedArrayBuffer || !isAsmJSCompilationAvailable())) 
> > quit(59)' --module-load-path 
> > /ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test/modules/
> >  -f 
> > /ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/firefox-68.12.0/js/src/jit-test/tests/asm.js/testBug1057248.js
> >  
> > Segmentation Fault (core dumped) 
> > 
> > core 'core' of 4573: 
> > /ws/grzemba/oi-userland/components/web/firefox/build_opt/amd64/dist/bin 
> > --------------------- thread# 1 / lwp# 1 --------------------- 
> > 0000000000d51211 
> > js::InternalBarrierMethods<JS::Value>::preBarrier(JS::Value const&) () + 
> > 5b3 
> > 0000000000b43671 js::SharedArrayBufferObject::dropRawBuffer() () + 33 
> > 0000000000b436eb js::SharedArrayBufferObject::Finalize(js::FreeOp*, 
> > JSObject*) () + 51 
> > 0000000000d3b700 bool FinalizeTypedArenas<JSObject>(js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::gc::Arena**, js::gc::SortedArenaList&, js::gc::AllocKind, 
> > js::SliceBudget&, js::gc::ArenaLists::KeepArenasEnum) () + 211 
> > 0000000000d3bb98 FinalizeArenas(js::FreeOp*, js::gc::Arena**, 
> > js::gc::SortedArenaList&, js::gc::AllocKind, js::SliceBudget&, 
> > js::gc::ArenaLists::KeepArenasEnum) () + 187 
> > 0000000000d3f124 js::gc::ArenaLists::backgroundFinalize(js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::gc::Arena*, js::gc::Arena**) () + b0 
> > 0000000000d3f39a 
> > js::gc::GCRuntime::sweepBackgroundThings(js::gc::ZoneList&, js::LifoAlloc&) 
> > () + ba 
> > 0000000000d3f6b2 
> > js::gc::GCRuntime::sweepFromBackgroundThread(js::AutoLockHelperThreadState&)
> >  () + 124 
> > 0000000000d3fa13 js::gc::BackgroundSweepTask::run() () + 47 
> > 0000000000d3fa50 
> > js::GCParallelTaskHelper<js::gc::BackgroundSweepTask>::runTaskTyped(js::GCParallelTask*)
> >  () + 9 
> > 00000000009f0ebf js::GCParallelTask::runTask() () + 7 
> > 00000000009f3f90 js::GCParallelTask::runFromMainThread(JSRuntime*) () + 20 
> > 00000000009f403b js::GCParallelTask::joinAndRunFromMainThread(JSRuntime*) 
> > () + 5b 
> > 0000000000d2da40 
> > js::gc::GCRuntime::queueZonesAndStartBackgroundSweep(js::gc::ZoneList&) () 
> > + 9c 
> > 0000000000d2de3a js::gc::GCRuntime::endSweepingSweepGroup(js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::SliceBudget&) () + 1e4 
> > 0000000000d275c0 sweepaction::SweepActionCall<js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::SliceBudget&>::run(js::gc::GCRuntime*, js::FreeOp*, js::SliceBudget&) 
> > () + 2c 
> > 0000000000d28fdf sweepaction::SweepActionSequence<js::gc::GCRuntime*, 
> > js::FreeOp*, js::SliceBudget&>::run(js::gc::GCRuntime*, js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::SliceBudget&) () + 39 
> > 0000000000d2e940 sweepaction::SweepActionRepeatFor<js::gc::SweepGroupsIter, 
> > JSRuntime*, js::gc::GCRuntime*, js::FreeOp*, 
> > js::SliceBudget&>::run(js::gc::GCRuntime*, js::FreeOp*, js::SliceBudget&) 
> > () + 3e 
> > 0000000000d5ea4f js::gc::GCRuntime::performSweepActions(js::SliceBudget&) 
> > () + 67 
> > 0000000000d5ee53 js::gc::GCRuntime::incrementalSlice(js::SliceBudget&, 
> > JS::GCReason, js::gc::AutoGCSession&) () + 3ad 
> > 0000000000d5f37e js::gc::GCRuntime::gcCycle(bool, js::SliceBudget, 
> > JS::GCReason) () + 1fc 
> > 0000000000d5f83c js::gc::GCRuntime::collect(bool, js::SliceBudget, 
> > JS::GCReason) () + b2 
> > 0000000000d5fa6d js::gc::GCRuntime::gc(JSGCInvocationKind, JS::GCReason) () 
> > + 4f 
> > 0000000000aaa4cd JSRuntime::destroyRuntime() () + 13d 
> > 0000000000a1be11 js::DestroyContext(JSContext*) () + a9 
> > 0000000000c14e5f JS_DestroyContext(JSContext*) () + 9 
> > 00000000008560e6 main () + 21fb 
> > 0000000000836427 _start_crt () + 87 
> > 0000000000836388 _start () + 18
> For the failed tests I get core dumps initiated by MOZ_ASSERT(isDouble()) in 
> setPrivate(void*) mostly, with stack traces similar like this:
> --------------------- thread# 1 / lwp# 1 ---------------------
> 0000000001c85879 JS::Value::setPrivate(void*) () + af 
> 0000000001edda15 JS::PrivateValue(void*) () + 3d 
> 0000000001ee9320 
> js::ArrayBufferObject::setDataPointer(js::ArrayBufferObject::BufferContents) 
> () + 32 
> 
> I assume the core is the wanted behaviour of the MOZ_ASSERT. 
> How can I investigate was is going wrong here? 
> I do the test with Firefox 68.1.20 esr. What I can found on 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org is related to newer versions of FF and the 
> failed test for bugs very old. 
> 
> Many Thanks

This sounds like you are hitting Bug 1568564 where the encoding of 
`PrivateValue` type acted up on certain compiler configurations in Firefox 68 
ESR. We did backport a workaround to Firefox 68.2.0+ that added an optional 
--enable-unaligned-private-values compilation flag. If this flag is available 
in your version you should give it a try.

The issue in that bug is that the code expects a certain alignment that was 
stricter than some compiler / OS pairs guaranteed.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to