A final clarification:

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Tantek Çelik <tan...@cs.stanford.edu>
wrote:

> Even if we (Mozilla) are delayed with implementation, we can
> still champion this stuff. We can still nominate someone to
> participate in the WG with subject matter expertise to help guide what
> we think will be more implementable features.
>
1.  Superficially (I haven't dug into it in detail), I don't believe
anything proposed in ARIA 1.1 or 1.2 is likely to be "not implementable" or
even "costly to implement" for browser vendors. It's more that the Mozilla
accessibility team currently doesn't have anyone who can devote time to
working on new spec things. To put it melodramatically, with current
resourcing, it's likely to take us months to even get to reading the spec
or implement the simplest of spec additions. I really hope this does not
remain the case for too long, but that's how it is right now.
2. For the same reason, we also don't have anyone with subject matter
expertise that's able (due to tie constraints) to participate meaningfully
in the WG.

Jamie
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to