I come with a followup on this matter, we’ve backed out the issues. Now the tree should be OK. Please see: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8a94faa5cc60495da5d80d4b3c07bf5877d2e6d8 <https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8a94faa5cc60495da5d80d4b3c07bf5877d2e6d8>
Thanks, ANdi > On 13 Apr 2018, at 15:48, Nathan Froyd <[email protected]> wrote: > > FWIW, all these complaints (and more) have been raised in the bug. > I'm not entirely sure what we're going to do yet, but rest assured > that people are definitely aware of the issues. > > Thanks, > -Nathan > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Kartikaya Gupta <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 6:18 AM, Jonathan Kew <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It's presumably auto-generated by a static-analysis tool or something like >>> that, but ISTM it has been overly aggressive, adding a lot more code churn >>> than necessary (as well as committing some pretty extreme style violations >>> such as over-long lines). >> >> +1. I too was sad to see the style violations/general ugliness of the >> changes in the patch. >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
