On 3/27/18 1:02 PM, Eric Shepherd wrote:
Yes, that's true. My thinking is that a first step could be to change
it so it had to be enabled using Policy Engine, and have an ESR release
with that
So presumably targeting 60? The timing is a bit tight...
Note that as things stand the only way to enable remote XUL for a
hostname is by adding permission manager entries. This needs to either
be done by a non-webextension extension, or by running code in a
privileged context (e.g. browser console) or by directly munging the
sqlite database involved. This last is what we do in our automation.
with a notice to users of ESR that that will be the last ESR
release to support remote XUL.
We can do that anyway, for 60, without changing how it's enabled, right?
-Boris
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
