On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:25 PM, Patrick McManus <pmcma...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> The objective here is a net improvement for privacy and integrity.

I understand that the goal is better privacy. But it's likely that
people get outraged if a browser sends information about what is
browser to an off-path destination without explicit consent regardless
of intention, nightliness or promises the destination has made.

Opt-in is the way to go to avoid damaging trust.

Like I said on the bug: "the way people are known to react this kind
of thing isn't in our power to negotiate". Hence, the intention being
more privacy doesn't mean that if we do this without explicit consent
people won't be outraged.

> Nightly is an explicitly experimental channel which is part of the reason
> it is the choice for the first validation.

It's totally reasonable from a user perspective to expect Nightly to
run the latest and potentially buggy code, but it doesn't follow that
it's OK to give Nightly users less control of their privacy.

FWIW, from the point of view of my expectations as a Nightly user,
this goes against the old "No surprises" privacy language we had. (It
seems that the "No surprises" privacy language has been removed. It's
not good that the new language doesn't make it obvious at a glance
whether Mozilla permits itself to do what's proposed here without
explicit opt in. It think it would be better for Mozilla to
unambiguously promise not to do the kind of thing that's being
proposed here without explicit opt in.)

> I initiated this thread on dev-platform because imo it is a reasonable
> scope for nightly changes, especially ephemeral flip pref changes, and
> that's why the FYI goes here. Its definitely not a secret. Messaging to a
> larger user base than is impacted invites confusion. Future possible
> changes impacting larger populations or putting things on trains would use
> other, more broadly read communications channels.

It seems to me that the appropriate messaging would be in-Nightly
messaging asking if the user wants to participate in an experiment
that uses Cloudflare as the DNS provider in place of whatever DNS
provider their system would otherwise use.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
https://hsivonen.fi/
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to