Thanks David Bolter, this helps a lot. On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:25 PM, David Bolter <dbol...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Hi Tantek, > > I spun this off the rec proposals thread as per your suggestion. > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 8:58 PM, Tantek Çelik <tan...@cs.stanford.edu> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:10 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org> wrote: >> > > [snip] > >> >> Two things: >> >> 1. Do we have an Intent to Implement / Ship for the full testable >> feature set of these specifications? (I couldn't find any such >> "Intent" "ARIA" emails in dev-platform, but I may have missed it). >> If not, could the implementing team please send after-the-fact >> either/both Intent to Implement / Intent to Ship emails for both specs >> to dev-platform? > > > This work is unscheduled and TBD but we will send an intent when ready. The > accessibility team has been explicitly deprioritized working on new ARIA > support until the Windows multiprocess accessibility support work is in good > shape, our priority backlog is addressed, and priority front end work is > done.
Makes sense. > Nonetheless, Joanie (chair of W3C ARIA spec) has been implementing some ARIA > recently in Firefox! Great! >> 2. Assuming we have such intent, do we have bugs filed in Bugzilla to >> implement the remaining testable features of both specifications? (to >> get the following %s to 100) > > > Not exhaustively no (for similar reasons) Understandable. Is https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343213 the metabug for both specs (and more)? It might be worth creating a couple of spec-specific meta bugs for tracking each spec (since they have separate test suites / implementation reports), and give us the opportunity to declare victory for each incrementally, but I'll leave that up to your discretion. >> From Core Mappings report above: >> Firefox on Linux using ATK: 79% of mappings successfully implemented >> (188/237) >> Firefox on macOS using AX API:: 41% of mappings successfully >> implemented (84/205) >> Firefox on Windows using MSAA + IAccessible2: 75% of mappings >> successfully implemented (181/242) >> (or do we have documented somewhere reasoning why we won't implement >> to 100% - and if so, do we have problems with some of the features?) >> >> From WAI ARiA report above: >> no % tallies provided, but lots of red and yellow squares in the FF** >> columns here: >> https://w3c.github.io/test-results/wai-aria/all.html >> > > It will be really great to get to a place where turning these green gets > back into our top priorities, unfortunately we're not there yet. Got it - perhaps this could be a good goal description for the appropriate meta bug. >> Feel free to follow-up to this part (re: specs that we implement) with >> a reply-with-subject-change to start a new thread as needed. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Tantek > > > Thanks for your detailed attention here! Absolutely, thanks for all your work on this David. Greatly appreciated. Tantek _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
