On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Andreas Tolfsen <a...@sny.no> wrote:

> Some time ago there was a discussion on dev-builds@ regarding
> the state of our in-tree source code documentation.  The main
> focus was that MDN, moving forward, will mainly revolve around web
> platform documentation and would actively start de-emphasising Gecko
> contribution docs.
>
> Now, that discussion paints the backdrop for this new thread, but it
> is well worth reading on its own and had a lot of good ideas in it
> that never materialised:
>
>         https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.builds/cp4bJ1QJX
> TE/Xqy_nHV5DAAJ
>
> The reality four months on is that more documentation than ever
> lives in the tree, and there is a sentiment that imposing the
> same rigorous peer review process we have for source code on
> documentation changes is overkill.
>
> bz made a modest proposal that documentation changes should not
> require bugs or reviews, and that they could be annotated with a
> special review flag to pass pre-receive hooks.  I’m including his
> original email below.
>
> If we still feel this is a good idea I would like to know what steps
> to take next to make that policy.
>

I am planning on implementing this. I'll probably track it off bug 1395763
somewhere. The timetable with Phabricator may hold up aspects of it a bit.


>
> -- >8 --
> From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu>
> Date: June 16, 2017 15:40
> Subject: Re: Builds docs on MDN
> To: dev-bui...@lists.mozilla.org
>
> On 6/16/17 9:33 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
>
>> I certainly feel like the barrier for filing bugs, creating a
>> patch, figuring out how to use readthedocs infrastructure, getting
>> reviews, etc. isn't really worth it
>>
>
> I believe we should not require filing bugs, reviews, or any of
> that for in-tree docs.  Just edit the doc, commit, push.  Add
> "r=documentation" if needed to placate hooks.  Just because it's
> in-tree doesn't mean it needs to use the whole heavyweight process.
> And if we can make these things auto-DONTBUILD, that's even better,
> of course.
>
> I agree it's still slower than a wiki. :(
> _______________________________________________
> dev-builds mailing list
> dev-bui...@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-builds
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to