On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Nathan Froyd <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Henri Sivonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is it feasible (with reasonably low effort) to introduce a new XPIDL >> type that is a pointer to a non-refcounted immutable static object in >> C++ and still gets bridged to JS? > > You can certainly have static objects with what amount to dummy > AddRef/Release methods passed through XPIDL (we do this in a couple of > places throughout Gecko), but I don't think you can get away with > having a non-refcounted object passed through XPIDL.
Do the AddRef/Release need to be virtual? -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] https://hsivonen.fi/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
