Do we have any data on existing content usage of -moz-appearance? Or is this a "ship it and see what breaks" kind of thing?
I have the vague recollection that this is something that might have non-trivial usage (especially and specifically "-moz-appearance: none"), so just want to make sure that's been considered. Otherwise yay for removing this from the web. :) Justin On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Mats Palmgren <m...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Summary: add support for the CSS UI property 'appearance:none | auto' with > '-webkit-appearance' as an alias. Unship '-moz-appearance'. > > 'appearance:none' works exactly as '-moz-appearance:none' -- it turns off > the native theme for elements that have one. 'appearance:auto' (the > initial value) makes an element have its default appearance. We are > currently shipping '-moz-appearance' with a large number of other values, > such as 'button', 'range', 'radio' etc. '-moz-appearance' will continue to > work exactly as is, but will now be restricted to UA and chrome style > sheets, i.e. it will *not* be available to web content. > > Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1333482 > > Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-ui-4/#appearance-switching > > Platfrom coverage: All > > Estimated release: 54 (tentatively) > > Preferences: layout.css.appearance.enabled for > 'appearance'/'-webkit-appearance' (enabled by default), > layout.css.moz-appearance.enabled for '-moz-appearance' (disabled by > default). All these properties are available to UA and chrome style sheets > though, regardless of the preference settings. > > Devtools bug: None needed, I think. > > Status in other implementations: No other UA implements the unprefixed > 'appearance' as far as I know. Edge implements '-webkit-appearance:none' > but no other values, nor do they implement it unprefixed. WebKit/Blink > implements '-webkit-appearance' with a plethora of values, much like we > currently do for '-moz-appearance'. I don't know what their plans are for > 'appearance' and/or restricting the number of supported values. > > I think the fact that Edge currently only ships '-webkit-appearance:none' > proves that's all that is needed for web compat. I tend to think we should > also implement the unprefixed property though, because that's what the CSS > spec says and I don't think it'll have any negative impact in terms of web > compat (I admit I'm not 100% certain of that though, but we can adjust as > needed). > > Tests: Reftests and mochitests included. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
