Agreed. In the perspective of the increasing shift toward incubation
at W3C (before WG and certainly before WD or CR), subgrid has yet to
be sufficiently incubated to really implement in the context of a
spec, unlike the rest of grid which has been prototyped with multiple
iterations (by other implementers) to get us where we are (hence it's
a great thing that we're shipping grid itself, well done Mats).

The circularity that Simon refers to can be broken by prototyping
subgrid separately, i.e. behind a feature flag, and iterating with
developer feedback, and getting that iteration in the spec, and then
taking that feature to an actual CR with actual shipping
implementations.

Unless by some lucky guess subgrid has been perfectly specified
without incubation, we should be ok with it being dropped from the
spec, or rather, pushed out into a future version.

Tantek


On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Jet Villegas <jville...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Unlike other parts of the Grid spec, we don't have sufficient implementor
> feedback (from ourselves or others) to evaluate the subgrid feature's
> suitability for implementation. That will take time to get, and we do plan
> to get it, but we want Grid available to people while we do so. That's not
> the same as "nobody's implementing, so we won't either."
>
> --Jet
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sa...@exyr.org> wrote:
>
>> On 16/11/16 01:40, Mats Palmgren wrote:
>>
>>> Note about the 'subgrid' feature:
>>> We will *not* support the subgrid feature of CSS Grid in this first
>>> release.  This feature is marked as "at-risk" in the spec and thus
>>> not needed for spec compliance.  (Chrome is likewise not going to
>>> support subgrid in their first release.)
>>>
>>
>> I don’t have a strong opinion on subgrid specifically, and other arguments
>> can be made, but I’d like to note:
>>
>> It is marked at-risk in the spec *because* several vendors had said they
>> might not support it at first. So using this to justify not supporting it
>> is a circular argument.
>>
>> --
>> Simon Sapin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-platform mailing list
>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to