On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Henri Sivonen <hsivo...@hsivonen.fi> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Aryeh Gregor <a...@aryeh.name> wrote:
>> If the concern is fingerprinting, perhaps it could be exposed only to
>> sites that the user is logged into (assuming we have a good working
>> definition of "logged in")?
>
> I think that's over-engineering it.
>
> I suggest we make it behave the current way for chrome,
> https://*.mozilla.org and https://*.netflix.com origins and make it
> return a constant otherwise.

This only helps us and Netflix.  Other sites that want to track fixes
will be left out in the cold.

Taking a step back: is fingerprinting really a solvable problem in
practice?  At this point, are there a significant fraction of users
who can't be fingerprinted pretty reliably?  Inevitably, the more
features we add to the platform, the more fingerprinting surface we'll
expose.  At a certain point, we might be taking away a lot of features
for the sake of trying to stop the unstoppable.  (I have no idea if
this is actually true now, though.  This is a genuine question.  :) )
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to