On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Daniel Veditz <dved...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > instead of having it sourced from the > > > > advertiser's > > > > origin, they instead stand > > up "<random-value>.publisher.example.com" > > > > and > > > > point > > > > it at the advertiser's > > IP addresses (via an A record to the advertiser's > > > > name never > > > > appears). > > > > > > This would have a similar cost/effort structure to using data > > > > channels and > > would similarly not be blocked by current domain-based ad blockers. > > > > Most ad-blockers (ABP, certainly) could easily block *. > publisher.example.com and whitelist the handful of > foo.publisher.example.com > and bar.publisher.example.com, etc. needed to make the site "work". > That seems like a very expensive manual process. -Ekr > wrt nsIContentPolicy, though, I'm not sure where a PeerConnection fits in. > > -Dan Veditz > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
