Added Raine Mäkeläinen, who has been committing to qtmozembed lately, to CC.

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Jim Blandy <jbla...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Henri Sivonen <hsivo...@hsivonen.fi> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano <masay...@d-toybox.com>
>> wrote:
>> > So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central?
>> > What
>> > the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central?
>>
>> My understanding is that
>> https://git.merproject.org/mer-core/qtmozembed/ still uses it. As we
>> are figuring out how to be more embeddable (see
>> https://medium.com/@david_bryant/embed-everything-9aeff6911da0 ), it's
>> probably a bad time to make life hard for an existing embedding
>> solution.
>
>
> This doesn't really answer the question. We can't have code in tree that
> isn't tested, and isn't used, and has nobody responsible for it.
>
> If someone is willing to fix it up and get it tested and included in the
> continuous integration process, then that's fine. But "someone might want to
> use it in the future" can't possibly be a legit reason to keep substantial
> bits of code in the tree.

It looked to me like the code is being used *now*.

Raine, does qtmozembed use the Qt widget code from mozilla-central?

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@hsivonen.fi
https://hsivonen.fi/
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to